From Second-Guessing Her Pricing to Making Informed Business Decisions: McKayla's Story

Client: McKayla Spencer, The Comma Mama Co.
Business: Blog Writing and SEO
Service: Reality check — core
Focus: Offer Development, Strategic Pricing, Capacity Planning, and Business Decision-Making

The challenge: She had ideas. She needed information to make decisions about them.

McKayla Spencer is the mama behind The Comma Mama Co., where she helps business owners work toward what she calls “social media-optional status” through SEO-backed blogging.

She'd invested in her business, established herself in her niche, and experienced a period of growth. She also had ideas about where she wanted to take things next.

The problem wasn't that she didn't know how to do her job or lacked ideas for growing her business.

She was having trouble deciding what to do with those ideas.

There were questions about her offers, what she should charge, how much work she could reasonably take on, and what direction made sense for the business she wanted to build.

As she explained:

“I had ideas on where I wanted to take it. I just couldn’t make a decision.”

And there was another consideration.

McKayla had previously invested in high-ticket coaching that hadn't worked for her. She'd spent roughly $1,000 a month with a coach whose availability and approach didn't suit her needs or circumstances.

That experience left her hesitant about investing in another coaching relationship.

“I was just trying to figure out what my next step was. And was scared that I was going to put my trust in the wrong person.”

So when we started talking, the question wasn't simply whether McKayla needed business support.

It was whether that support would actually help her make decisions about her business without forcing her into somebody else's way of operating.

The starting point: A nervous pricer with some decisions to make

McKayla described herself as a nervous pricer.

She knew how to deliver her services, but determining what to charge was something she regularly second-guessed.

She also had an idea she'd been sitting on called Pod to Blog.

It was something she wanted to explore, but there were several decisions between having the idea and knowing whether or how to move forward with it.

What would the offer include? How should it be positioned? What would she need to charge? How would it fit into her existing business? And what would delivering it actually require from her?

These questions were connected.

You can't make an informed pricing decision without considering what you're selling, what it costs to deliver, what resources you have available, and what you need the business to produce.

And you can't determine whether an offer makes sense for your capacity by looking at the number of calls or deliverables alone.

Those were the kinds of things we needed to work through.

Not so I could tell McKayla what her business should look like, but so she had enough information to decide for herself.

What we actually worked on

McKayla and I began working together in January 2025 through a three-month Queen of Coins coaching engagement.

Our approach was collaborative, and the priorities weren't fixed in place before we'd even started.

In fact, Pod to Blog wasn't originally the focus of our work.

As we worked together, that changed.

McKayla later explained:

“We didn’t even start the coaching with a focus on Pod to Blog. But she matched my pace even when we switched mid-way.”

I think that's an important part of this story because the purpose of the engagement wasn't to get her through a predetermined set of steps.

It was to support the decisions she was actually facing.

1. Working through the offer

McKayla already had the idea for Pod to Blog.

We worked through what that idea could look like as an actual offer, including its positioning, pricing, and delivery.

The point wasn't to decide that every good idea needed to become a new product.

It was to give McKayla enough clarity about this particular idea to determine whether and how she wanted to pursue it.

2. Giving her a framework for pricing decisions

One of the biggest pieces of our work was creating a structured pricing document.

McKayla had been making pricing decisions without much calculation behind them, which left her questioning whether the numbers she chose made sense.

Rather than simply suggesting a rate, I developed a framework she could use to think through her pricing.

She could return to it when considering new offers, changing existing ones, or explaining her rates to potential clients.

Here's what she said about it:

“A lot of the time, there was no real calculation behind the way I priced. The pricing doc was one of my favorite takeaways, a real eye-opener. Mainly because I am very much a nervous pricer.”

She also described it as giving her a starting point she could use moving forward.

And that's the part I care about.

The value wasn't that I picked a number for her.

It was that she had a way to make pricing decisions without starting from guesswork every single time.

3. Looking at capacity and what delivery would require

We also looked beyond the offer itself.

Because making a sale and delivering what you've sold are two different things.

We considered what her services would require during and after delivery, how that work would fit into her capacity, and what ongoing support could look like.

This mattered for Pod to Blog, but it also mattered for the rest of her business.

An offer doesn't exist independently from the person delivering it, their other commitments, or the resources they have available.

So rather than looking only at whether an offer could sell, we considered what operating it would actually involve.

What changed for McKayla?

There were a few things McKayla took away from our work together that I think are worth separating from what happened in her business afterward.

She had a pricing framework she could reuse.

Instead of approaching each pricing decision without a clear calculation, she had a document she could reference when making changes or developing new offers.

She had worked through the structure of an offer she wanted to pursue.

Pod to Blog was no longer just an idea she'd been sitting on. She had considered its positioning, pricing, and delivery.

She had support that adapted to the decisions she was making.

When our priorities changed, the engagement changed with them.

And she felt comfortable bringing forward questions and ideas without worrying that she was asking the wrong things.

As she explained:

“I’m so happy I trusted her enough to open the curtain on my ideas, what was going on, and being able to get feedback on things you wouldn’t talk a lot about with other people. She never made me feel silly about my questions at any point.”

She also described having someone to work through those decisions with as giving her a sense of security.

Those are the outcomes of our work that I can speak to directly.

And what did McKayla do with that information?

She went and built the fucking thing.

McKayla launched Pod to Blog, sold every available spot in its first cohort, and had every participant continue into her extended support program.

That's a sold-out first cohort and 100% continuation into ongoing support.

And McKayla deserves the credit for that.

She developed the program, marketed it, brought people into it, delivered the work, and created an experience that made those participants want to continue.

I didn't do those things.

What I did was help her work through some of the decisions that came before them.

And McKayla herself connected that support to her decision to move forward.

Speaking about Pod to Blog, she said:

“It probably would not exist in the way that it is today, or if at all, if I had not worked with Kat.”

She thought it might otherwise have been another idea she kept putting off.

That's meaningful feedback, but it doesn't mean I can claim responsibility for every result that followed.

It means McKayla found our work useful in getting from a place of uncertainty to a place where she could make decisions and act on them.

What she accomplished after that belongs to her.

Why this matters to the way I work

There's a version of this case study where I tell you I helped a client launch a sold-out group program with 100% retention.

Technically, I was involved in the process that preceded those results.

But that framing skips over the part of the work I was actually responsible for.

McKayla didn't come to me as someone who needed me to manufacture a successful business for her.

She already had expertise, experience, ideas, and the ability to do the work.

She needed help understanding some of the decisions in front of her.

We looked at her pricing, offers, capacity, and delivery. We worked through the information available, identified what needed more consideration, and developed tools she could use to make decisions.

And when the direction of our work changed, we changed with it.

That's what I contributed.

I can't tell you whether McKayla would have launched Pod to Blog without working with me. I can tell you what we worked on, what she said she gained from it, and what she went on to accomplish.

I think that's a much more useful way to understand the value of business support than attributing every subsequent success to the person who provided it.

Because the goal isn't to make someone dependent on having me tell them what to do.

It's to help them understand their business well enough to make informed decisions about what happens next.

What does this have to do with Reality Check?

McKayla and I worked together through Queen of Coins, a three-month coaching engagement. She wasn't a Reality Check client, and I don't want to present her results as though they came from a service that didn't exist at the time.

But the way I approached our work reflects the same thinking that eventually shaped Reality Check.

I don't want to start by telling someone to raise their prices, add an offer, hire support, or change their delivery.

I want to understand what's happening first.

What are you trying to accomplish? What does your business currently require from you? What information are you using to make decisions? What have you already tried? And where are the gaps between what you have, what you need, and what you want?

Because sometimes the issue really is pricing.

Sometimes it's capacity, delivery, positioning, or the way several parts of the business interact.

And sometimes the thing you thought needed fixing isn't the thing creating the problem.

Reality Check — The Diagnostic ($997) is where we investigate those questions.

We look at your business, resources, capacity, offers, buyers, and desired outcomes together. You receive a written diagnostic report outlining my findings, the evidence behind them, and recommendations for what deserves attention and why.

It's a standalone engagement designed to help you understand what you're working with before deciding what to change.

If you want continued advisory support afterward, Reality Check Core and Extended are available through the shared waitlist.

I can't promise that understanding your business will produce a sold-out launch, a particular revenue number, or any other predetermined result.

What I can offer is a process for investigating what's happening and making recommendations based on what we find.

Because you should have more to work with than somebody else's opinion about what your business needs.

Before you change the thing, let's make sure it's the thing.

Join the Reality Check Core & Extended Waitlist

Next
Next

Your Business Looks Successful. Do You Like Your Life?