F*cK Consistency: Your Capacity Is Supposed to Change
I think we need to let go of the idea that our capacity should be consistent from one week to the next.
I do not mean that we need a kinder definition of consistency, or a more sustainable version of it, or a system that finally helps us become consistent without burning ourselves out. I mean I am increasingly unconvinced that consistency should be the standard in the first place.
The word keeps our attention fixed on output. Did I produce the same amount this week? Did I show up the same way? Did I maintain the pace? Did I keep the rhythm going? We tend to use consistency as evidence that something is working and inconsistency as evidence that something has gone wrong.
But human beings do not work like that.
Our capacity changes because our lives change. Our bodies change. Our moods, responsibilities, relationships, health, stress levels, and circumstances change. Hormonal cycles can affect what we have available. So can grief, caregiving, travel, illness, a major life event, or an ordinary week that simply asks more from us than the one before it. Some people notice seasonal patterns. Some track their menstrual cycles. Some believe moon cycles affect them and pay attention to those too.
I am much less interested in deciding which explanation someone is allowed to use than I am in whether they are paying enough attention to themselves to notice that their capacity is not static.
The problem is not that capacity changes. The problem is how much pressure we put on ourselves to behave as though it does not.
Productivity has been sold to us as a virtue
We expect consistency is that we have been taught to push through variation rather than acknowledge it.
Productivity is rarely treated as just one thing we happen to do. It becomes evidence about who we are. Productive people are reliable, capable, serious, hard-working, and useful. They are people worth hiring and paying. They are people who have their shit together.
So when our capacity drops, it can feel like more than a practical inconvenience. It can start poking at identity.
If I was productive last week, why can I not do the same thing this week? If I handled this workload before, why does it feel harder now? If I know I am capable, why am I struggling with work that normally feels manageable?
Because pushing through is so culturally rewarded, a lot of people answer those questions by simply increasing the effort. They finish the work anyway. They make the deadline. They keep showing up. From the outside, that can look like beautiful consistency.
Internally, the experience may be completely different.
Maybe they borrowed from sleep. Maybe they became less patient. Maybe everything outside the most urgent work got neglected. Maybe the next day was useless. Maybe they spent the whole week irritated with everyone. Maybe they kept making themselves perform at the same level until eventually they could not.
The fact that the output remained relatively consistent does not mean the capacity underneath it did. Sometimes it only means someone became very good at overriding the fluctuation.
Giving your all does not mean producing the same amount
This is where I think high-achieving, highly conscientious people get particularly screwed.
They care. They want to do good work. They want to be dependable. They want clients to have a good experience. They do not want to look flaky, incapable, unserious, or like someone who cannot be trusted with responsibility.
So when they have less available, they do not necessarily change the expectation. They increase the effort.
Then we start confusing effort with capacity.
You can genuinely give everything you have and still produce less than you did the week before. Those are not contradictory statements.
If you have significantly less energy, focus, emotional bandwidth, or physical ability available today, giving 100 percent of yourself does not magically turn that into the output of a high-capacity day.
But we tend to compare the result instead of the conditions. Last week's result becomes the benchmark, and anything below it starts looking like evidence that we did not try hard enough.
That is a brutal way to evaluate yourself.
Your capacity can change for incredibly ordinary reasons
Sometimes we talk about fluctuations in capacity as though something dramatic has to happen before they are legitimate.
It does not.
A hormonal cycle can change how you feel and function. So can caregiving. Travel. A family event. Illness. A chronic flare-up. Stress. An anniversary that affects you more emotionally than you expected. You might notice certain weeks of the month are easier. You may know one day of the week is consistently more demanding because of your personal responsibilities. You may realize you are much more social at one point in your cycle and would rather be left the hell alone at another.
You do not need one universally approved reason for your capacity to change.
You need enough awareness to notice that it does.
What I want people to stop doing is immediately translating that change into a character assessment.
Because a lower-capacity week is one thing. A lower-capacity week plus shame becomes a completely different experience.
Now you are not simply tired, distracted, less social, or less creatively sharp. You are also asking whether you are falling behind, whether you are still capable, whether other people can tell, whether you look less professional, whether you are doing enough, or whether someone else would be a better choice.
That judgment is often much heavier than the fluctuation itself.
A lot of those standards did not even come from us
I think it is worth asking where we learned that our output was supposed to remain so consistent in the first place.
School. Old workplaces. Family expectations. Professional culture. Online business. Capitalism generally.
We absorb the idea that our usefulness is evidence of our worth, then spend years insisting we do not believe that while continuing to use productivity as a weekly scorecard.
It is hard to separate those things because so much of society genuinely is built around what people can produce, contribute, and provide. Most of us need to work. Most of us need to make money. If you run a business, there are real commitments and financial realities that cannot simply disappear because your energy is lower this week.
But none of that makes lower capacity a moral problem.
Having less available does not make you less capable. Producing less in one week does not undo what you have done before. Changing your pace does not automatically mean you are falling behind.
Sometimes it simply means that you are a human being whose available resources changed.
We don’t need a “healthier” definition of consistency
I do not really want to replace consistency with a nicer version of consistency. I want to question why we are organizing so many business decisions around sameness in the first place.
Why should the goal be roughly the same output every week? Why should success mean showing up the same way every day? Why should a business require us to behave as though our capacity is fixed when we already have plenty of evidence that it is not?
I am much more interested in whether someone is making educated choices for themselves and their business.
Are you paying attention to what is actually happening? Are you noticing when your capacity changes? Are you considering your life and your goals alongside the work? Are you making a decision based on what is available now instead of blindly enforcing an expectation you created under completely different conditions?
That matters much more to me than whether your output looks perfectly even on a content calendar.
If there is anything I want to see consistently, it is people getting better at making informed choices for themselves.
How do you actually feel in the business?
We spend a tremendous amount of time measuring what comes out of a business. Revenue. Content. Sales. Clients. Deliverables. Growth. ( This is where Emotional Economics comes in for me.)
I think we spend much less time asking what it feels like to be the person inside this shit.
Do you feel clear and engaged? Are you interested in your work? Do you have enough room to think? Are you appropriately challenged rather than chronically overwhelmed? Do you still like what you are doing? Do you feel like you participate in your own life, or does your life mostly happen in the gaps between work and recovering enough to work again?
Or do you feel frantic, resentful, ashamed, numb, depleted, chronically behind, or like one unexpected thing could knock the entire week sideways?
None of those feelings gives us a complete diagnosis of the business. But they are information, and I do not think we should throw that information away simply because it is harder to quantify than output.
I would much rather someone make an educated business decision using that information than preserve an arbitrary streak of consistency because they believe that is what a serious business owner is supposed to do.
Capacity is allowed to change
A lot of people are already trying very hard, in a difficult online landscape trying to make it all work.. I see you. .
They do not need another lecture about discipline. They do not need another system promising to make them perform exactly the same way every week. And they definitely do not need to shame themselves whenever their capacity changes.
You can have a high-output week and enjoy the hell out of it. You can have a lower-output week and not make it mean anything terrible about you. You can push when pushing makes sense and adjust when adjustment makes sense.
The important part is noticing what your body, mood, life, and work are telling you without immediately turning that information into evidence that something is wrong with you.
Inside Tales from the Capacity Crypt, I want people to get much more comfortable with the fact that capacity fluctuates.
Not so they can predict themselves perfectly or optimize the fluctuation. Not so they can finally build a magical schedule where every week behaves exactly like the one before it.
I want them to have enough language and self-awareness to notice what is happening, take the unnecessary judgment out of it, and make a better-informed decision from there.
Maybe you have more available this week. Maybe you have less. Maybe the reason is obvious, and maybe it is not.
You do not have to force sameness onto yourself to prove that you are serious about your business.
F*ck consistency.
Pay attention to how you actually feel. Pay attention to what is true. Make educated choices for yourself and your business.
And maybe judge how well the business is working by more than how much of yourself you managed to turn into output this week.

